HOME ABOUT US ASK THE RABBI SUBSCRIBE CONTACT US
Lubavitch of Brighton

PrintSend this page to a friend
6 Comments Posted


Question 3: Prescience



Since G-d knows the future, what choice do we have in it?

The Short Answer:

This argument is the easiest to deal with: Knowing what someone is going to do is not synonymous with making that person do it. This is simple to understand.

A Little Longer:

In the Mishnah (Ethics of the Fathers 3:15), Rabbi Akiva says it straight out: "Everything is foreseen, and free choice is granted." The classic commentaries don't have a problem with that. Allow me to paraphrase their very simple explanation:

If I see a child in front of an ice cream and tell you he's going to eat it, does that mean I made him eat it? Let's say a psychologist predicts that a certain criminal, if released, will murder again. And it happens. Do we lock up the psychologist or the criminal? Of course not. The psychologist's knowledge had no involvement in the criminal's act of murder.

Similarly, if someone came back from the future in a time machine and told you what was going to happen to the world, does that mean he is responsible for all that happens from that point on? G-d knows what you are going to do because He is beyond time. For Him, it all happened already. So, how does that imply that He denies us free choice to make those decisions?

In other words, knowledge of the future is a result of the events of the future, not their cause. In G-d's super-temporal realm, the result can exist before the cause. But it's still a result and not a cause.

Now, if you will say that all that is true with us human beings, but with G-d, isn't it His knowledge that creates all things? -- then I suggest you read on as we discuss the relationship of G-d's knowledge to this world in the following sections.

On to the next question:

G-d wants something to happen and it happens. So how could I possibly choose to do something He doesn't like? Who's more powerful, after all?


The Paradox of Free Choice - Six Questions

1) Determinism: Isnt everything predetermined by the mechanics of the universe?

2) Robotism: G-d knew exactly what I was going to do when He made me this way. Im just a programmed machine. How can I be blamed for being what I am?

3) Prescience: Since G-d knows the future, what choice do we have in it?

4) Omnipotence: G-d wants something to happen and it happens. So how could I possibly choose to do something He doesnt like? Whos more powerful, after all?

5) Oneness: Since there is nothing else but His Oneness, what room is left for us to make any difference?

6) Primal Cause: If G-d is the Primal Cause, doesnt the buck stop there?


« Previous
Next »


PrintSend this page to a friend
6 Comments Posted

By Tzvi Freeman   More articles...  |   

Rabbi Tzvi Freeman heads Chabad.org's Ask The Rabbi team, and is a senior member of the Chabad.org editorial team. He is the author of a number of highly original renditions of Kabbalah and Chassidic teaching, including the universally acclaimed "Bringing Heaven Down to Earth." To order Tzvi's books click here.


The content on this page is copyrighted by the author, publisher and/or Chabad.org, and is produced by Chabad.org. If you enjoyed this article, we encourage you to distribute it further, provided that you comply with the copyright policy.
 

6 Comments Posted
Reader Comments
Latest Comments:
Posted: July 25, 2007
A further observation
The internet is a prospectively omniscient consciousness comprising all of our combined knowledge and intelligence. It was inevitable that we would come to this point, and we are here now.
Posted By whig

Posted: July 25, 2007
Time is relative
A person can elevate and see a traffic accident before it happens, as an inevitable consequence of the present observed vectors. The larger your field of view the more prescient you are. Omniscience implies prescience.
Posted By whig

Posted: Aug 13, 2006
In further response to "anonymous", the point of these articles are not to deny or support the existence of G-d. The point of these articles are to provide a framework to "understand" free will.

If one reads these articles, I would have to assume the reader is at least entertaining the notion of a First Cause, a G-d, or he or she will not even be *interested* in the concept of Free Will, which seems to me exclusively a *theistic* theory.

The existence or inexistence of G-d is another question altogether, and to me, would preceed the questions rpoposed in these Free Will articles.
Posted By Rox



Post a Comment
Subject:
Comment:
  1000 Characters Remaining
Name*:
Email*:
City:   State/Country:
* indicates a required field
 


The Paradox of Free Choice: Six Questions
Question 1: Determinism
Question 2: Robotism
Question 3: Prescience
Question 4: Omnipotence
Question 5: Oneness
Question 6: Primal Cause

Related
  More articles on
Divine Providence (80 articles)
Freedom of Choice (46 articles)

Lubavitch of Brighton 15 The Upper Drive Hove, BN3 6GR England 44-1273-321-919

Powered by Chabad.org © 2001-2007 Chabad-Lubavitch Media Center. All rights reserved.
In everlasting memory of Rabbi Yosef Y. Kazen, pioneer of Torah, Judaism and Jewish information on the web